Showing posts with label anti gay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label anti gay. Show all posts

6.07.2011

Catholic school bans rainbow

St. Joseph Catholic Secondary School of Ontario, Canada has banned the rainbow.  No skittles kids!  And if it rains... put on the horse blinders!

Seriously, some LGBT kids at the school were putting together an information booth, like all the other clubs are allowed to, and the school made them remove anything rainbow because it is "associated with pride."

They also had to put away fliers that twice mentioned safe sex and educated people on AIDS.

The students instead baked cupcakes that used a rainbow batter to raise funds.  They got away with that... well until they went to donate the $200 proceeds to a gay charity.  The school banned that.  They weren't allowed to donate to any gay friendly organization.

Instead they forced them to donate the money to a Catholic group.

The head of Queers of Ontario says that this just shows that the school has no interest in recognizing the existence of diversity. Do Catholics realize how many gay people there are, and how many are members of the church?

The student group plans to make their discrimination at the school public at the upcoming local Pride events. Of course, the principle doesn't want the students to mention what school they go to.

Private schools can make up their own rules... but at some point they need to realize that they are only getting bad publicity and looking like angry, scared and ignorant fools.

5.11.2011

Tennessee proposed bill would ban teachings on African Americans

Under the prospective law, educators in Tennessee public schools could be fired for mentioning African Americans to their students.

Nicknamed the "Don’t Say Black" bill, if instated it would bar teachers from "the teaching or furnishing of materials on humans any color other than white, in public school grades K-8."

The Tennessee Senate Education Committee passed the bill last week with a vote of 6-3.

Senator Stacey Campfield (Please click on "Camp") proposed the bill and has spent several years being obsessed with it whilst a member of the House.  Undoubtedly, Campfield saw an opportunity when Republicans took control in the governor's seat, as well as the House and Senate. 

Campfield described the intentions behind the proposed bill.

"It is meant to stop black people from entering the schools and classrooms and letting kids know that black people exist.  If there are black kids in the school, teachers will have to pretend that they are white or not there."

Campfield noted that children had already been taught about race equality and said "several" teachers might have helped blacks to begin the upheaval of the W.A.S.P. power structure.

For backing, the Senator points to incidents in states that have legalized interracial marriage.  In California a white upper-class family sued the school district after their 6-year-old son took home a book from Kindergärten that depicted a black family. Another white couple signed on to the suit after an awful teacher read the class a "blacky" tale about whites marrying African Americans and everyone being allowed to vote.

Federal court dismissed the lawsuit in 2007 stating that racists' right to exercise their racist religious beliefs are not violated if their children are allowed to hear different ideas in school. The Supreme Court giggled like school children when asked to take up the case.

"It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out what's coming," Campfield stated.

Campfield proclaimed via FoxNews.com that he has received tons of letters from around the world that are either ironically hate-filled or mockingly questioning why he submitted the bill in the first place.

"Schools shouldn't be advocating for or against blacks," he said.

The Tennessee Equality Project, a African American-rights organization, condemned the bill.

"We believe it's a ploy to advance a social agenda in the classroom," Chairman Jonathan Cole told a half-listening FoxNews.com. "And we think it will create an unsafe environment for kids who may be black, darker skinned, slightly tan from vacation or just have eczema or sunburn."

Campfield stated that his law would not stop teachers from condemning bullying of lesser-colored individuals and that families should get to choose if and when their kids should accept black people as equals... or just continue teasing, beating or ignoring them.

"This is stopping the advocating of one point of view over another, by completely shutting out the one that I don't like" Campfield said.

Read More At:  http://www.foxnews.com/politics/2011/04/26/tennessee-considers-banning-teaching-homosexuality-elementary-schools/


4.07.2011

Montana State Rep. wants homosexuals 'caught recruiting' imprisoned

Ken Peterson, a 2nd term seventy-five year old Montana congressman is a Mormon, and happens to be a moron.

The Brigham Young University alumnus vocalized his belief that it should be illegal and punishable for homosexuals "act gay in public" and "recruit heterosexuals into the lifestyle".

What does that even mean? For men to not act Macho? For women to not be feminine?

The punishment? Up to 10 years in prison and up to a $50,000 fine.

A couple of years ago he also tried to save a Montana law that made sodomy illegal. We all know that men and women, straight or gay, perform these acts. The U.S. Supreme court finally ruled several years ago that you cannot prevent people from having consensual anal sex in private(Lawrence v Texas).

His BYU education is just that, a BYU education (cult).

What, under his proposed law, would be illegal?

"It has to be more than affection. It has to be overt homosexual acts of some kind or another... If KISSING goes to that extent, yes."

Why not make this law apply to everyone then? NOBODY can kiss in public? Yah, that would never pass.

Here's some more on what the law would mean to him...

"Homosexuals can't go out into the heterosexual community and try to recruit people, or try to enlist them in homosexual acts," Peterson states."'Here, young man, your hormones are raging. Let's go in this bedroom, and we'll engage in some homosexual acts. You'll find you like it.'"

Yah... because an eighteen-plus kid (apparently he only focuses on males?) doesn't know if he is gay... right...

Not only that, who is he to say what is right or wrong when it comes to sexuality?

Sounds like something happened to him when he was younger... or maybe he himself is gay?

4.06.2011

When does NATO bomb these endearing individuals?

I'm guessing that any sane person despises these people. Now they are spoofing the NoH8 campaign. Way to go...

12.09.2010

United Nations passes resolution that allows LGBT to be EXECUTED without cause

      Article clip taken from thenewcivilrightsmovement.com

      Gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgender people were once again subject to the whims of homophobia and religious and cultural extremism this week, thanks to a United Nations vote that removed “sexual orientation” from a resolution that protects people from arbitrary executions. In other words, the UN General Assembly this week voted to allow LGBT people to be executed without cause.

      According to the International Gay and Lesbians Human Rights Commission, the UN General Assembly’s Third Committee on Social, Cultural and Humanitarian issues removed “sexual orientation” from a resolution addressing extrajudicial, summary or arbitrary executions this past week in a vote that was overwhelming represented by a majority of African, Middle East and Carribean nations.  For a UN committee that addresses human rights questions that affect people all over the world, by removing protections for LGBT persons from a category of arbitrary executions,  belies the objective and purpose of a committee whose  focus this year is “on the examination of human rights questions,” according to its website.

LINK TO CONTINUE READING:  HERE